Abstract
Introduction and objectiveDiagnostic testing for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) cannot distinguish between colonization and infection. A positive NAAT may therefore represent a false positive for infection, since diarrhea due to various aetiologies may occur in hospitalized patients. Our objective was to help answer the question: “does this medical inpatient with diarrhea have CDI?”DesignWe conducted a retrospective cohort study (n = 248) on the Clinical Teaching Units of the Royal Victoria Hospital (Montréal, Canada). Patients were included if they had a NAAT between January 2014 and September 2015 and their admission diagnosis was not CDI. CDI cases and non-CDI cases were compared, and independent predictors of CDI were determined by logistic regression.ResultsSeveral factors were independently associated with CDI, including: hemodialysis (OR: 13.5, 95% CI: 2.85–63.8), atrial fibrillation (OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.52–9.01), whether the patient received empiric treatment (OR: 3.01, 95% CI: 1.04–8.68), systemic antibiotic therapy prior to testing (OR: 4.23, 95% CI: 1.71–10.5), previous positive NAAT (OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.41–9.72), and a leukocyte count of 11x109/L or higher (OR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.42–8.26). The area under the curve was 0.80.ConclusionFor patients presenting with hospital-onset diarrhea, various parameters can help differentiate between CDI and other causes. A clinical prediction calculator derived from our cohort (http://individual.utoronto.ca/leet/cdiff.html) might assist clinicians in estimating the risk of CDI for inpatients; those with low pre-test probability may not require immediate testing, treatment, nor prolonged isolation.
Highlights
Introduction and objectiveDiagnostic testing for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) cannot distinguish between colonization and infection
Several factors were independently associated with CDI, including: hemodialysis (OR: 13.5, 95% CI: 2.85–63.8), atrial fibrillation (OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.52–9.01), whether the patient received empiric treatment (OR: 3.01, 95% CI: 1.04–8.68), systemic antibiotic therapy prior to testing (OR: 4.23, 95% CI: 1.71–10.5), previous positive NAAT (OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.41– 9.72), and a leukocyte count of 11x109/L or higher (OR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.42–8.26)
For patients presenting with hospital-onset diarrhea, various parameters can help differentiate between CDI and other causes
Summary
Introduction and objectiveDiagnostic testing for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) cannot distinguish between colonization and infection. A positive NAAT may represent a false positive for infection, since diarrhea due to various aetiologies may occur in hospitalized patients. There are many causes, including medications, chronic gastrointestinal diseases, as well as acute viral and bacterial infections. Since a sudden spike in C. difficile infection (CDI) rates at the turn of the 21st century in both Canadian and American hospitals, it has increased drastically in prevalence across North America [2,3,4,5,6], recently surpassing methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus (MRSA) as the most common source of nosocomial infection in many American jurisdictions [7]. In 2011, 500,000 Americans were diagnosed with and 29 000 patients died of CDI, costing an estimated US $4.8 billion in acute treatment alone [8]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
