Abstract

Accurate spatial maps of wetlands are critical for regional conservation and rehabilitation assessments, yet this often remains an elusive target. Such maps ideally provide information on wetland occurrence and extent; hydrogeomorphic (HGM) type; and condition/ level of degradation. All three elements are needed to provide ancillary layers to support mapping from remote imagery and ground-truthing. Knowledge of HGM types is particularly important, because different types show differential levels of sensitivity to degradation, and modeling accuracy for occurrence. Here, we develop and test a simple approach for predicting the most likely HGM type for mapped yet unattributed wetland polygons. We used a dataset of some 11,500 wetland polygons attributed by HGM types (floodplain, depression, seep, channeled and un-channeled valley-bottom) from the Western Cape Province in South Africa. Polygons were attributed and described in terms of nine landscape metrics, at a sub-catchment scale. Using a combination of box-and-whisker plots and PCA, we identified four variables (groundwater depth, relief ratio, slope and elevation) as being the most important variables in differentiating HGM types. We divided the data into equal parts for training and testing of a simple Bayesian network model. Model validation included field assessments. HGM types were most sensitive to elevation. Model predication was good, with error rates of only 32%. We conclude that this is a useful technique that can be widely applied using readily available data, for rapid classification of HGM types at a regional scale.

Highlights

  • One of the means of categorizing wetlands is according to hydrogeomorphic (HGM) type, which is defined by geomorphic setting, water source and pattern of water flow through the wetland unit (Brinson, 1993; Ollis et al, 2013)

  • Given the fact that HGM types are defined in terms of key driving process that underlie wetlands (Brinson, 1993) they provide a useful means of inferring ecosystem functioning and supply of ecosystem services (Euliss et al, 2013) as well as a means of delimiting broad response units for ecological condition assessments (Kotze et al, 2012)

  • The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots further indicated that model predictions were generally good, but that the predictions were more accurate for the digital dataset than for the field-assessed HGM types (Figure 9)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the means of categorizing wetlands is according to hydrogeomorphic (HGM) type, which is defined by geomorphic setting (e.g., hillslope or valley-bottom), water source (e.g., surface water dominated or sub-surface water dominated) and pattern of water flow through the wetland unit (diffuse or channeled) (Brinson, 1993; Ollis et al, 2013). Given the fact that HGM types are defined in terms of key driving process that underlie wetlands (Brinson, 1993) they provide a useful means of inferring ecosystem functioning and supply of ecosystem services (Euliss et al, 2013) as well as a means of delimiting broad response units for ecological condition assessments (Kotze et al, 2012). While data on wetland extent, HGM type, and ecological condition are increasingly recognized as important for globaland regional-scale (province, state, county, or catchment) wetland assessments, methods, and studies on these approaches are limited worldwide (Guidugli-Cook et al, 2017). Wetlands have been iteratively mapped and typed using a combination of field assessments and interpretation of aerial photographs. This is a labor intensive process, but typically leaves large swathes of landscape undermapped. Large discrepancies in concurrence between national inventories and field observations of wetlands (Guidugli-Cook et al, 2017) raises concerns about the reliable use of national datasets when scrutinized at a regional or local scale

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call