Abstract
Intelligent predictive methods have the power to reliably estimate water saturation (Sw) compared to conventional experimental methods commonly performed by petrphysicists. However, due to nonlinearity and uncertainty in the data set, the prediction might not be accurate. There exist new machine learning (ML) algorithms such as gradient boosting techniques that have shown significant success in other disciplines yet have not been examined for Sw prediction or other reservoir or rock properties in the petroleum industry. To bridge the literature gap, in this study, for the first time, a total of five ML code programs that belong to the family of Super Learner along with boosting algorithms: XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, AdaBoost, are developed to predict water saturation without relying on the resistivity log data. This is important since conventional methods of water saturation prediction that rely on resistivity log can become problematic in particular formations such as shale or tight carbonates. Thus, to do so, two datasets were constructed by collecting several types of well logs (Gamma, density, neutron, sonic, PEF, and without PEF) to evaluate the robustness and accuracy of the models by comparing the results with laboratory-measured data. It was found that Super Learner and XGBoost produced the highest accurate output (R2: 0.999 and 0.993, respectively), and with considerable distance, Catboost and LightGBM were ranked third and fourth, respectively. Ultimately, both XGBoost and Super Learner produced negligible errors but the latest is considered as the best amongst all.
Highlights
We developed code programs based on 4 boosting methods: XGboost, LightGBM, Catboost, and Adaboost, in addition to the Super Learner, a total of 5 different algorithms to compare the accuracy of water saturation predictions across the board
This article demonstrates the idea of the application of machine learning algorithms, such as XGBoost, LightGBM, AdaBoost, CatBoost, and Super Learner, to predict water saturation from well-logging data
The study revealed that XGboost and Super Learner might be promising tools in water saturation prediction from well log data collected by the authors without relying on a resistivity log
Summary
Laboratory-based methods such as Retort method and Dean–Stark and Soxhlet extraction are assumed to be accurate, these methods consider the rock sample has representative fluid saturation, which practically is not possible except for very expensive uncommon sampling methods such as sponge core barrel or pressure core barrel [1,2]. They are exhaustive, time-consuming, and provide discrete data points. Dean–Stark extraction is a technique for measurement of water and oil saturation by distillation extraction when the water in the core is vaporized by boiling solvent, condensed and collected in a calibrated trap [1]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.