Abstract

The performance of eight different methods to predict human volume of distribution (VDss) using a large data set (N > 100) was evaluated.The accuracy was assessed by the end points % within two-fold and absolute average fold error (AAFE). The ability to rank order was accessed by the σ and bias was examined using average fold error. Significance of observed differences was established using statistical permutation testing.The Rodgers-Lukova equation, a tissue composition model, for acids and single species scaling based on rat for other ion classes showed the best results in absence of non-rodent data.The semimechanistic Øie-Tozer model based on all thee preclinical species showed the best performance overall (81% within two-fold, AAFE 1.55, σ 0.62). This was not statistically significantly better at the 95% confidence level than the same model based on two preclinical species or single species scaling from monkey. Thus, the use of primates appears difficult to justify when the sole goal is to extrapolate human volume of distribution.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.