Abstract

Since between 1.5 and 8 kg (400 kg/patient/year) of biomedical polymeric waste (BPW) is usually discarded by landfilling or combusting after each dialysis treatment, this study provides evidence for safe and environment-friendly utilisation of BPW, sourced from dialysis treatment and donated by the health and industrial partners, by incorporating it in high-strength concrete. Moreover, the paper aims to provide engineers, designers, and the construction industry with information regarding the mechanical performance of high-strength concrete containing BPW, and the susceptibility of the current international codes and standards on the prediction of the mechanical performance. A new concrete mix design incorporating BPW was proposed and verified by several trial mixes. Three Soft, Hard, and Hybrid BPW were added to the conventional high-strength concrete in different percentages ranging from 1.5% to 9% by weight of cement. Afterwards, the fresh and hardened concrete properties, namely slump, density, compressive strength, tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), were investigated, and existing prediction models were employed to verify their suitability for the new concrete. Generally, adding Hybrid BPW resulted in better mechanical performance than soft or hard BPW addition, while eliminating the waste separation phase. The results also showed that the mechanical performance of BPW-containing concrete is predictable by current codes, addressing possible engineering design limitations. New higher accuracy regression-based models were also proposed to reach better engineering interpretations.

Highlights

  • IntroductionPublisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

  • A decline in the slump was observed with the increase of biomedical polymeric waste (BPW) percentage in condecline in the the slump was with the of of percentage crete.AA

  • This paper reported the results of an experimental study conducted to investigate and

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. To meet the sustainability measures and due to the increasing demand for medical services worldwide, managing biomedical waste is becoming more crucial [1,2,3]. About 80% of published lifecycle analysis studies, compared to mechanical recycling and incineration methods, recommend mechanical recycling as an advantage [4,5]. Among different mechanical recycling approaches, employing various types of waste in forms of aggregate and fibre in the production of cementitious materials is considered as an environment-friendly, safe, and economical disposal approach [6,7,8,9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.