Abstract
The main objective of this article was to investigate the extent to which the margin of victory can be predicted solely by the rankings of the opposing teams in NCAA Division I men’s basketball games. Several past studies have modeled this relationship for the games played during the March Madness tournament. This work aimed at verifying whether the models advocated in previous studies can accurately predict the margin of victory in regular season games. Indeed, most previous articles have shown that a simple quadratic regression model provides fairly accurate predictions of the margin of victory when team rankings only range from 1 to 16. Does that still hold true when team rankings increase to 351? Do the model assumptions hold? Can semi- or nonparametric methods that yield even better results (i.e. predicted margins of victory that more closely resemble actual results) be found? The analyses presented in this article suggest that the answer is “yes” to all three questions!
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.