Abstract

Two relatively simple approaches are developed and used to calculate (predict) the standard interfacial electron-transfer (ET) rate constants (k degrees) of the Ru(NH3)6(3+/2+) couple dissolved in aqueous electrolyte solutions in contact with Au electrodes coated with self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) composed of HS(CH2)nOH as functions of both n and temperature. These approaches are suggested by the conclusion reached by Smalley et al. (J. Electroanal. Chem. 2006, 589, 1-6) that the interfacial ET rate of a solution-dissolved redox couple in contact with a SAM is, within 1 order of magnitude, the same as the (normalized) interfacial ET rate of a similar attached (as a constituent of a similar SAM) couple. The calculations, therefore, employ the measured electronic coupling of the attached (to Au electrodes through alkanethiolate bridges) -PyRu(NH3)5(3+/2+) couple. The two approaches also both include dynamic solvent effects on the ET kinetics and the influence of electronic coupling on the activation barrier for the ET reaction. At T=298 K and n=3, 11, and 14, the predicted rate constants are in very good agreement with the existing measurements of k degrees. However, for n<3 at 298 K, the predicted rate constants are extremely large (i.e., >4.5 cm s(-1)) and do not tend toward a limiting value. Additionally, even if the electronic coupling between a Au electrode and a Ru(NH3)6(3+/2+) moiety located at the surface of the SAM is >0.1 eV, the calculated standard rate constant is not directly proportional to the inverse of the longitudinal dielectric time of the solvent. A primary reason for both the absence of a limiting value for the predicted k degrees's at 298 K and the attenuated influence of dynamic solvent effects is the activation energy barrier suppression caused by large values of the electronic coupling.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call