Abstract

For decades, recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) has been used to make recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). Numerous studies have compared the mechanical properties and durability of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) to those of natural aggregate concrete (NAC). However, test results on the shear strength of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete beams are still limited and sometimes contradictory. Shear failure is generally brittle and must be prevented. This article studies experimentally and analytically the shear strength of reinforced RAC beams without stirrups. Eight RAC beams and two controlled NAC beams were tested under the four-point flexural test with the shear span-to-effective depth ratio (a/d) of 3.10. The main parameters investigated were the replacement percentage of RCA (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) and longitudinal reinforcement ratio (ρw) of 1.16% and 1.81%. It was found that the normalized shear stresses of RAC beams with ρw = 1.81% at all levels of replacement percentage were quite similar to those of the NAC counterparts. Moreover, the normalized shear stress of the beam with 100% RCA and ρw = 1.16% was only 6% lower than that of the NAC beam. A database of 128 RAC beams without shear reinforcement from literature was analyzed to evaluate the accuracy of the ACI 318-19 shear provisions in predicting the shear strength of the beams. For an RCA replacement ratio of between 50% and 100%, it was proposed to apply a reduction factor of 0.75 to the current ACI code equation to account for the physical variations of RCA, such as replacement percentage, RCA source and quality, density, amount of residual mortar, and physical irregularity.

Highlights

  • The test results from this study showed higher normalized shear stresses for all tested beams compared to both shear equations

  • The results indicate that the ACI 318-19 shear equation yielded conservative results when the percentage of recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) was below 75%, in which only two tested results failed below 1.0

  • Predictions of concrete shear strength from the current ACI provisions were evaluated against a database from tests found in the literature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Since the largest source of CDW is concrete, numerous research studies have examined the use of recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) to produce recycled aggregate concrete (RAC), of which the mechanical properties and durability are typically compared to those of natural coarse aggregate concrete (NAC) [5–13]. This is because coarse aggregate is the main concrete component, constituting about 60% to 75% of concrete volume. Previous research attempted to conduct more tests on the shear strength of RAC beams so as to compare their results to existing design equations. A modification factor is proposed to account for the physical variations of RCA, such as replacement percentage, RCA source and quality, density, amount of residual mortar, and physical irregularity

Materials Properties
Concrete Mixture Proportions
Details of Test Beams
Test Setup and Procedure
Ultimate Capacity and Failure Behaviour
Load-Deflection Responses
Prediction of Concrete
Ultimate Concrete Shear Strength
Effect of Longitudinal Reinforcement
Effect of RCA Replacement Ratio
Proposed RCA Uncertainty Factor to Existing Design Equation
Model Validation and Compared to Existing Test Data
Design Recommendations
Conclusions and Future Works
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call