Abstract

Most commonly, to estimate permeability, we can use values of porosity, pore size distribution, and water saturation from logging data and established correlations. One benefit of using wireline log data to estimate permeability is that it can provide a continuous permeability profile throughout a particular interval.This study will focus on the evaluation of formation permeability for a sandstone reservoir in the reservoir formations of Hassi R’Mel Field Southern from well log data using the multivariate methods. In order to improve the permeability estimation in these reservoirs, several statistical regression techniques have already been tested in previous work to correlate permeability with different well logs. It has been shown that statistical regression for data correlation is quite promising. We propose a two-step approach to permeability prediction that utilizes non-parametric regression in conjunction with multivariate statistical analysis. First we classify the well log data into electrofacies types. A combination of principal component analysis, model-based cluster analysis and discriminant analysis is used to characterize and identify electrofacies types. Second, we apply non-parametric regression techniques to predict permeability using well logs within each electrofacies. Three non-parametric approaches are examined via alternating conditional expectations (ACE), generalized additive model (GAM) and neural networks (NNET) and the relative advantages and disadvantages are explored. The results are compared with three other approaches to permeability predictions that utilize data partitioning based on reservoir layering, lithofacies information and hydraulic flow units. An examination of the error rates associated with discriminant analysis for uncored wells indicates that data classification based on electrofacies characterization is more robust compared to other approaches.These methods are tested and compared at the heterogeneous reservoirs in Triassic formations of Hassi R’Mel. The results show that permeability prediction is improved by applying variable selection to non-parametric regression ACE while tree regression is unable to predict permeability.In comparing the relative predictive performance of the three regression methods, the alternating conditional expectations with ACE method appears to outperform the other two methods.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.