Abstract

The identification of MHC restricted epitopes is an important goal in peptide based vaccine and diagnostic development. As wet lab experiments for identification of MHC binding peptide are expensive and time consuming, in silico tools have been developed as fast alternatives, however with low performance. In the present study, we used IEDB training and blind validation datasets for the prediction of peptide binding to fourteen human MHC class I and II molecules using Gibbs motif sampler, weight matrix and artificial neural network methods. As compare to MHC class I predictor based on sequence weighting (Aroc=0.95 and CC=0.56) and artificial neural network (Aroc=0.73 and CC=0.25), MHC class II predictor based on Gibbs sampler did not perform well (Aroc=0.62 and CC=0.19). The predictive accuracy of Gibbs motif sampler in identifying the 9-mer cores of a binding peptide to DRB1 alleles are also limited (40 cent), however above the random prediction (14 cent). Therefore, the size of dataset (training and validation) and the correct identification of the binding core are the two main factors limiting the performance of MHC class-II binding peptide prediction. Overall, these data suggest that there is substantial room to improve the quality of the core predictions using novel approaches that capture distinct features of MHC-peptide interactions than the current approaches.

Highlights

  • A major task of the immune system is to identify cells that have been infected by pathogens and discriminate them from healthy cells

  • This is realized by the MHC class-I and II antigen processing and presentation pathway and the duty is assigned to helper T-lymphocytes (HTL) and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL)

  • A critical step in CD4+ T cell activation is the recognition of exogeneous peptides presented by MHC class-II molecules [2]

Read more

Summary

Background

A major task of the immune system is to identify cells that have been infected by pathogens and discriminate them from healthy cells. Peptides were classified assumption can only be considered to be an approximation and in into binders (IC50

Conclusion
Acknowledgment:
Findings
References:
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call