Abstract

Recently, other combinations of teeth are claimed to be better predictors for size estimation of permanent canine and premolars. The present study aimed to determine which combinations of teeth presented an appropriate predictor in Western Australians using digital technology. A total of 500 (323 females, 177 males) participants meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly selected from private orthodontic clinics. Mesiodistal dimensions of selected teeth obtained from pre-orthodontic treatment digital records were analyzed using SPSS 20. Fifteen possible combinations of teeth were used to determine the best prediction capability. Different combinations of teeth showed a higher correlation with the sum of permanent canine and premolars. In females, group 13 (Mandibular incisors and maxillary first molars) and in males, group 15 (mandibular incisors, maxillary central incisors, and first molars) and group 14 (mandibular incisors and first molars) showed a higher correlation in maxilla and mandible respectively. Linear regression equations were developed based on the best predictor for each arch and gender. Permanent mandibular incisors may not be better predictors when used alone. Newly developed equations, based on different combinations of teeth, more accurately predicted the sum of mesiodistal dimensions of permanent canine and premolars in the Western Australian population.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call