Abstract
The goal of therapy in essential thrombocythemia (ET) is reducing thrombotic risk. No algorithm to predict hemorrhage risk exists. The impact ofanti-platelet, cytoreductive and anticoagulation therapies on risk of major bleeding (MB) was evaluated. MB events were retrospectively analyzed in 1381 ET from 10 European centers. There were 0.286MB events/person-year. Neither the International Thrombosis Prognostic Score for thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia (IPSET-t) nor the revised IPSET-t (r-IPSET-t) was predictive for hemorrhage-free survival at 10years (p = 0.092 vs p = 0.1). Ageand leukocyte count were MB risk factors, while low hemoglobin was protective. For ET with extreme thrombocytosis (ExtT) and leukocytosis cytoreduction was not protective. MB were more frequent in ET with ExtT who received anticoagulation. Antiplatelet therapy was not, while anticoagulation was a risk factor for MB (HR 3.05, p = 0.016, CI 1.23-7.56), in particular vitamin K antagonists (22.6% of those treated had a MB event, HR 2.96, p = 0.004, CI 1.41-6.22). Survival at 10years was associated with hemorrhage (OR 2.54, p < 0.001) but not thrombosis (HR 0.95, p = 0.829). Hemorrhage has a higher risk of mortality than thrombosis. Improved risk stratification for MB is necessary. The choice of anticoagulation, cytoreduction and antiplatelet therapies is an important area of research in ET.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
