Abstract

BackgroundImmune checkpoint blocker (ICB) has shown significant clinical activity in melanoma. However, there are no clinically approved biomarkers to aid patient selection. We aimed to identify patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma who are likely to benefit from ICB monotherapy using easily accessible clinical indicators.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 134 patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma who received ICB monotherapy between 2014 and 2018. Prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using Cox regression analysis.ResultsDuring the median follow-up of 13.7 months, the median OS and PFS were 18.4 and 3.4 months, respectively. Visceral/central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (OS: adjusted hazards ratio [HR], 1.82; p=.014; PFS: HR, 1.59; p=.024), lymphopenia (<1000 cells/µL) within 3 months (OS: HR, 1.89, p=.006; PFS: HR, 1.70; p=.010), and elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (OS: HR, 2.61; p<.001; PFS: HR, 2.66; p<.001) were independent prognostic factors for both poor OS and PFS. Development of immune-related adverse events (irAE; e.g., hypothyroidism or vitiligo) within 6 months showed a trend toward better OS in multivariable analysis (HR, 0.37; p=.058). Patients with normal LDH levels and no visceral/CNS metastasis had a substantially better OS than the others (median, 40.4 vs. 13.6 months; p<.001). Among others, patients who developed irAE within 6 months achieved long-term OS (median, 43.6 vs. 13.1 months; p=.008). A decision tree was suggested using four risk factors, and the risk stratification provided significant distinction between the survival curves.ConclusionThe four easily accessible clinical indicators associated with better treatment outcomes after ICB monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma were LDH level, the extent of disease, lymphopenia, and irAE. The combined use of these indicators can be clinically useful in improving risk stratification of patients treated with ICB monotherapy.

Highlights

  • The recent emergence of cancer immunotherapies has led to a significant shift in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma [1]

  • The CheckMate 066 trial showed that nivolumab was associated with significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and progressionfree survival (PFS) compared with dacarbazine in treatment-naïve patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation [2]

  • We have previously reported that the objective response rate of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) monotherapy in South Korean patients with melanoma is 15% [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The recent emergence of cancer immunotherapies has led to a significant shift in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma [1]. Several randomized controlled phase III trials have shown the efficacy and safety of ICBs. The CheckMate 066 trial showed that nivolumab was associated with significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and progressionfree survival (PFS) compared with dacarbazine in treatment-naïve patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation [2]. Patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab plus dacarbazine had better OS than those who received dacarbazine alone [3]. Patients with metastatic melanoma who received ipilimumab plus gp100 peptide vaccine had improved OS than those who received gp100 alone [4]. We aimed to identify patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma who are likely to benefit from ICB monotherapy using accessible clinical indicators

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call