Abstract

To systematically characterise the effect of plasticity on the creep resistance of a 10 % Cr steel, strain-controlled monotonic and cyclic/hold tests have been isothermally conducted at 600 °C. In particular, this work focuses on the influence of the magnitude of plastic strain transient(s) preceding the first peak tensile hold for two types of loading sequence. Along with the use of Norton–Bailey formulations assuming time- or strain-hardening, the effectiveness of a method developed by Woodford is explored for converting stress relaxation profiles to equivalent forward creep curves. For quantitative comparison and model validation, conventional creep tests have also been conducted on the same 10 % Cr steel at 600 °C for two different stress levels. Experimental results show that the creep deformation resistance of this steel is significantly reduced if the loading transient immediately preceding the hold is plastic. Furthermore, reduction in creep resistance is found to be more pronounced with increasing plastic strain amplitudes. Forward creep curve construction results indicate that all three assessment methodologies tend to offer qualitatively similar trends although the quantitative predictions differ slightly due to their respective underlying formulations. The creep-rate versus time plots for the constructed creep curves (until the attainment of steady-state conditions) also lead to a similar conclusion when compared with those from conventional creep tests. Finally, the successful implementation of the Woodford method to stress relaxation data from cyclic/hold tests broadens its current scope of applicability and its versatility can thus be further improved.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call