Abstract

In order to evaluate rapid testing methods based on the relationship between feed abrasive value (FAV) and physicochemical properties (particle size, bulk density, dry matter (DM), soluble dry matter, water-holding capacity (WHC), ash, crud protein, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), physically effective NDF and non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC)), 100 empirical dataset were used. Relationships were investigated using multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANNs). The mean relative error was significantly (P < 0.01) lower for ANN than MLR model. Globally, the non-linear ANN model approach is shown to provide a better prediction of FAV than linear multiple regression.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.