Abstract

BackgroundThe emergency department (ED) triage system to classify and prioritize patients from high risk to less urgent continues to be a challenge.ObjectiveThis study, comprising 80,433 patients, aims to develop a machine learning algorithm prediction model of critical care outcomes for adult patients using information collected during ED triage and compare the performance with that of the baseline model using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS).MethodsTo predict the need for critical care, we used 13 predictors from triage information: age, gender, mode of ED arrival, the time interval between onset and ED arrival, reason of ED visit, chief complaints, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, oxygen saturation, and level of consciousness. The baseline model with KTAS was developed using logistic regression, and the machine learning model with 13 variables was generated using extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and deep neural network (DNN) algorithms. The discrimination was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The ability of calibration with Hosmer–Lemeshow test and reclassification with net reclassification index were evaluated. The calibration plot and partial dependence plot were used in the analysis.ResultsThe AUROC of the model with the full set of variables (0.833-0.861) was better than that of the baseline model (0.796). The XGB model of AUROC 0.861 (95% CI 0.848-0.874) showed a higher discriminative performance than the DNN model of 0.833 (95% CI 0.819-0.848). The XGB and DNN models proved better reclassification than the baseline model with a positive net reclassification index. The XGB models were well-calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow test; P>.05); however, the DNN showed poor calibration power (Hosmer-Lemeshow test; P<.001). We further interpreted the nonlinear association between variables and critical care prediction.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that the performance of the XGB model using initial information at ED triage for predicting patients in need of critical care outperformed the conventional model with KTAS.

Highlights

  • Overcrowding in the emergency department (ED) has become a major worldwide health care problem [1,2,3]

  • After excluding patients with cardiac arrest or death upon ED arrival (n=401), those transferred to another hospital (n=6230), discharged with uncompleted care (n=2696), and with missing or invalid values (n=58,105), a total of 80,433 ED adult patients were included in this study, with 3737 (4.6%) of them identified as experiencing critical care (Figure 1)

  • The study population of this study was split into two samples: (1) a training data set, comprising 80% of the data set, with 64,346 patients and containing 3015 (4.7%) critical care patients, and (2) a validation data set, consisting of the remaining 20% of the data set, with 16,807 patients, including 722 (4.5%) of them ascertained as receiving critical care

Read more

Summary

Introduction

ED triage is the first risk assessment for prioritizing patients at high risk and determining the course of ED care for patients [5,6,7,8]. Five-level triage systems, including the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), Manchester Triage System (MTS), and emergency severity index (ESI), are widely used [2,8,9]. Five-level triage systems are well established in ED, they need to be improved because they heavily rely on healthcare providers’ subjective judgment, resulting in high variability [5,7,8,9,10,12]. The emergency department (ED) triage system to classify and prioritize patients from high risk to less urgent continues to be a challenge

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call