Prediction of Best Micro and Small Entrepreneurs using EDAS Method

Abstract

In this from analysis EDAS method is the most ideal solution Short-distance and negative-best The solution with the longest distance from the solution Determines, but the comparison of these distances Does not consider importance. From the result it is seen that entrepreneur 3 is got the first rank where as is the entrepreneur 3 is having the lowest rank. First, we briefly review the definition of P2TLS and introduce the P2TLN scoring function, accuracy function and operating laws. Then, we merged the traditional EDAS model for multi-scale panel decision making (MCGDM) with P2TLNs. Ours to consider conflicting attributes The model presented was very accurate and effective. Finally, a number case for green supplier selection was given to illustrate this new model, Also Figure 2-Double Linguistic Weight Average (P2TLWA), Figure 2-Double Linguistic Weight Geometric (P2TLWG) Integration Operators and EDAS Some comparisons were made between. To further illustrate the advantages of the new method, the model with P2TLNs.Entrepreneurs play an important role in the economic development of a country. The economy of a country Development depends primarily on its entrepreneurs. Mainly India as an agricultural country Entrepreneurship can be considered as a powerful tool for economic growth. Minor, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) account for 7-8 per cent and GDP of India 45 percent of GDP. It contributes 40 per cent to exports. They are the economy The engine of development is approved. Next to agriculture, the MSME sector has the highest number People work. MSMEs are spread across the country are of different types required for different segments of the market Produce products. Geographical localization, different product range and novelty and the potential for job creation is equitable in the context of economic growth and Making them more important with regional balance. To solve the unemployment problem, the growth and self-employment of SMEs is pure. Alternative: entrepreneur 1, entrepreneur 2, entrepreneur 3, entrepreneur 4, entrepreneur 5, and entrepreneur 6. Evaluation Preference: C1-Credit histories, C2-Behavior preference, C3-Performance abilities, C4-Identity features, C5-Interpersonal relationships Taken for self-employment there is a need to attract more young people to entrepreneurial activities. From the result it is seen that entrepreneur 3 is got the first rank whereas is the entrepreneur 2 got is having the lowest rank.