Abstract

Recently, anticancer peptides (ACPs) have emerged as unique and promising therapeutic agents for cancer treatment compared with antibody and small molecule drugs. In addition to experimental methods of ACPs discovery, it is also necessary to develop accurate machine learning models for ACP prediction. In this study, features were extracted from the three-dimensional (3D) structure of peptides to develop the model, compared to most of the previous computational models, which are based on sequence information. In order to develop ACPs with more potency, more selectivity and less toxicity, the model for predicting ACPs, hemolytic peptides and toxic peptides were established by peptides 3D structure separately. Multiple datasets were collected according to whether the peptide sequence was chemically modified. After feature extraction and screening, diverse algorithms were used to build the model. Twelve models with excellent performance (Acc > 90%) in the ACPs mixed datasets were used to form a hybrid model to predict the candidate ACPs, and then the optimal model of hemolytic peptides (Acc = 73.68%) and toxic peptides (Acc = 85.5%) was used for safety prediction. Novel ACPs were found by using those models, and five peptides were randomly selected to determine their anticancer activity and toxic side effects in vitro experiments.

Highlights

  • IntroductionCancer treatment continues to face the challenge of increasing resistance to chemical and receptor-targeted anticancer drugs

  • The purpose of this study was to construct models for predicting anticancer activity and safety of peptides based on their 3D structures, and to collect different datasets to compare the differences between the models developed by natural peptides and chemically modified peptides

  • Compared with the previous model prediction methods for anticancer peptides (ACPs) [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26], features were extracted based on the 3D structure of peptides for the first time, which can be used as a supplementary method for the prediction of ACPs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cancer treatment continues to face the challenge of increasing resistance to chemical and receptor-targeted anticancer drugs. Owing to the increased proportion of phosphatidylserine (negatively charged) on the surface of cancer cells compared to normal cells, cationic amphiphilic peptides may be an effective and highly selective antitumor drug. The antitumor mechanisms of ACPs can be divided into two types: selective membrane destruction and non-membrane dissolution, which include inhibition of angiogenesis and promotion of tumor cell apoptosis [5]. Despite these advantages, ACPs still face challenges before becoming effective clinical agents, such as poor stability, hemolysis and toxicity to normal tissue cells. It is essential to develop methods to identify safer and more effective ACPs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call