Abstract

The main objective of this article is to develop a physically constrained support vector machine (SVM) to predict C-band backscatter over snow-covered terrain as a function of geophysical inputs that reasonably represent the relevant characteristics of the snowpack. Sentinel-1 observations, in conjunction with geophysical variables from the Noah-MP land surface model, were used as training targets and input datasets, respectively. Robustness of the SVM prediction was analyzed in terms of training targets, training windows, and physical constraints related to snow liquid water content. The results showed that a combination of ascending and descending overpasses yielded the highest coverage of prediction (15.2%) while root mean square error (RMSE) ranged from 2.06 to 2.54 dB and unbiased RMSE ranged from 1.54 to 2.08 dB, but that the combined overpasses were degraded compared with ascending-only and descending-only training target sets due to the mixture of distinctive microwave signals during different times of the day (i.e., 6 A.M. versus 6 P.M. local time). Elongation of the training window length also increased the spatial coverage of prediction (given the sparsity of the training sets), but resulted in introducing more random errors. Finally, delineation of dry versus wet snow pixels for SVM training resulted in improving the accuracy of predicted backscatter relative to training on a mixture of dry and wet snow conditions. The overall results suggest that the prediction accuracy of the SVM was strongly linked with the first-order physics of the electromagnetic response of different snow conditions.

Highlights

  • S serves as a water tower that stores winter precipitation and discharges it through snowmelt [1]

  • Sentinel-1 observations from the ascending (6 P.M. local time) versus descending (6 A.M. local time) overpasses as well as the combination of the two different overpasses during Sep 2016 to Aug 2017 were utilized by examining the influence of the different training target sets on the support vector machine (SVM) prediction efficacy

  • Predicted backscatter from the different sets of training targets was evaluated by comparing against Sentinel1 observations not utilized during training

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

S serves as a water tower that stores winter precipitation and discharges it through snowmelt [1]. Quantification of snow water equivalent (SWE) and snow depth has commonly been conducted using ground-based networks [e.g., Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL), Global Surface Summary of the Day (GSOD), and National Weather Service (NWS) Cooperative Stations (COOP)] These observations have been widely used for evaluating snowpack properties (e.g., SWE and snow depth) from remote sensing retrievals as well as from land surface models (LSMs) [9], [10]. Satellite imagery from visible and infrared sensors is primarily used for mapping snow cover area (SCA) and snow cover fraction (SCF) based on the high albedo of snow relative to other natural surfaces [15], [16] It is known as one of the most intuitive approaches to. Such an analysis is a necessary precursor to a proposed DA framework to be completed in a follow-on study

Study Area
Sentinel-1 Observations
Land Information System
Microwave Properties of Snow
Support Vector Machine
Validation Approach
Influence of Training Targets on SVM Prediction
Influence of Training Window Length on SVM Prediction
Influence of Separate Training for Dry and Wet Snow Conditions
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.