Abstract
I read with great interest the retrospective study by Hom et al,[1][1] in which a model combining clinical metrics with blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability data from dynamic CT was presented to predict symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and malignant edema in acute ischemic stroke. The
Highlights
The authors report that 3 of the 32 patients in their cohort (9.4%) had HT that was classified as PH2, which is unusually high, especially given that not all patients received tissue plasminogen activator
The most illustrative of the 3 PH2s was used by the authors for publication in Fig 1
I believe the more appropriate classification of the HT shown in Fig 1 is HI2
Summary
The authors report that 3 of the 32 patients in their cohort (9.4%) had HT that was classified as PH2, which is unusually high, especially given that not all patients received tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) (though the exact number of patients who did was not reported). PH2 is an uncommon event, occurring only in 1.7% of the 6444 intravenous tPA-treated patients in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study[4] and in 1.9% of the 418 intravenous tPA-treated patients in ECASS III.[5] Presumably, the most illustrative of the 3 PH2s was used by the authors for publication in Fig 1 (http:// www.ajnr.org/cgi/content/full/32/1/41/F1).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have