7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620101015
Copy DOIPublication Date: Oct 1, 1991 | |
Citations: 109 |
The objective of this research was to evaluate the acute toxicity of bulk sediment vs. pore water or elutriate to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), cladocerans (Ceriodaphnia dubia), amphipods (Hyalella azteca), and oligochaetes (Lumbriculus variegatus). A total of 29 different samples from seven sites were used for this analysis. In most instances, pore water was more toxic than corresponding elutriate. Based on the results of these assays, pore water, but not elutriate, was an effective test fraction for predicting the presence of bulk sediment toxicity; however, there were a number of observations of pore water toxicity in the absence of bulk sediment toxicity. Data from this study concerning the sensitivity of Pimephales promelas, Hyalella azteca, and Lumbriculus variegatus to bulk sediment vs. pore water or elutriate suggest that upper-water-column species are inappropriate organisms for use in bulk sediment tests focused on evaluating in situ toxicity to benthic species. Hyalella azteca was the most sensitive and Lumbriculus variegatus the least sensitive species evaluated.
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.