Abstract

Abstract. The status of the soil organic carbon (SOC) stock at any position in the landscape is subject to a complex interplay of soil state factors operating at different scales and regulating multiple processes resulting either in soils acting as a net sink or net source of carbon. Forest landscapes are characterized by high spatial variability, and key drivers of SOC stock might be specific for sub-areas compared to those influencing the whole landscape. Consequently, separately calibrating models for sub-areas (local models) that collectively cover a target area can result in different prediction accuracy and SOC stock drivers compared to a single model (global model) that covers the whole area. The goal of this study was therefore to (1) assess how global and local models differ in predicting the humus layer, mineral soil, and total SOC stock in Swedish forests and (2) identify the key factors for SOC stock prediction and their scale of influence. We used the Swedish National Forest Soil Inventory (NFSI) database and a digital soil mapping approach to evaluate the prediction performance using random forest models calibrated locally for the northern, central, and southern Sweden (local models) and for the whole of Sweden (global model). Models were built by considering (1) only site characteristics which are recorded on the plot during the NFSI, (2) the group of covariates (remote sensing, historical land use data, etc.) and (3) both site characteristics and group of covariates consisting mostly of remote sensing data. Local models were generally more effective for predicting SOC stock after testing on independent validation data. Using the group of covariates together with NFSI data indicated that such covariates have limited predictive strength but that site-specific covariates from the NFSI showed better explanatory strength for SOC stocks. The most important covariates that influence the humus layer, mineral soil (0–50 cm), and total SOC stock were related to the site-characteristic covariates and include the soil moisture class, vegetation type, soil type, and soil texture. This study showed that local calibration has the potential to improve prediction accuracy, which will vary depending on the type of available covariates.

Highlights

  • About 30 % of the global terrestrial carbon (C) stock is stored in forests, with 60 % located belowground (Pan et al, 2011)

  • The goal of this study was to (1) assess how global and local models differ for predicting the humus layer, mineral soil, and total soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in Sweden forest ecosystems, (2) evaluate to which extent and at which scale remotely sensed covariates can explain the variability in SOC stock compared to site-specific covariates in the Swedish forest, and (3) identify covariates which may have potential for future prediction models in forest SOC stock assessments

  • Modelling with All covariates (allCs) reduced the cross-validation RMSE by 2 %, 1 %, and 6 % compared to SSC models and by 7.9 %, 10 %, and 6 % compared to group of covariates (GoCs) models, respectively, for the humus layer, mineral soil, and total SOC stock

Read more

Summary

Introduction

About 30 % of the global terrestrial carbon (C) stock is stored in forests, with 60 % located belowground (Pan et al, 2011). These forests act mostly as a large net sink for atmospheric carbon, but concerns exist for the potential release of C under the impact of global warming over the century (Price et al, 2013; Kauppi et al, 2014). Many studies have focused on assessing the soil organic carbon (SOC) stock in forest soils (Kumar et al, 2016; Ottoy et al, 2017; Sheikh et al, 2009; Prietzel and Christophel, 2014), which is crucial for meeting the requirements of the climate convention and the Kyoto Protocol for reporting all sources and sinks of car-. Analysis of the C cycle in forests is crucial to the understanding of climate-related changes in the global C pool

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call