Abstract

The transcranial application of weak currents to the human brain has enjoyed a decade of widespread use, providing a simple and powerful tool for non-invasively altering human brain function. However, our understanding of current delivery and its impact upon neural circuitry leaves much to be desired. We argue that the credibility of conclusions drawn with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is contingent upon realistic explanations of how tDCS works, and that our present understanding of tDCS limits the technique’s use to localize function in the human brain. We outline two central issues where progress is required: the localization of currents, and predicting their functional consequence. We encourage experimenters to eschew simplistic explanations of mechanisms of transcranial current stimulation. We suggest the use of individualized current modeling, together with computational neurostimulation to inform mechanistic frameworks in which to interpret the physiological impact of tDCS. We hope that through mechanistically richer descriptions of current flow and action, insight into the biological processes by which transcranial currents influence behavior can be gained, leading to more effective stimulation protocols and empowering conclusions drawn with tDCS.

Highlights

  • We suggest the use of individualized current modeling, together with computational neurostimulation to inform mechanistic frameworks in which to interpret the physiological impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

  • Building upon combined neurostimulation and neuroimaging approaches that allow for identifying interactions between stimulation-induced behavioral change and neural activity (Siebner et al, 2009; Bestmann and Feredoes, 2013), this would involve the application of tDCS during recording of brain activity with magnetoand electroencephalography (M/EEG) or functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and modeling of the resultant perturbation to infer the neurophysiological changes underlying the observed changes in gross brain activity and behavior

  • Improving and demonstrating the focality of tDCS through the use of high definition electrode arrays (HD-tDCS) (Kuo et al, 2013) might potentially make tDCS a far more valuable tool for systems neuroscientists looking to elucidate the function of specific structures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations We argue that the credibility of conclusions drawn with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is contingent upon realistic explanations of how tDCS works, and that our present understanding of tDCS limits the technique’s use to localize function in the human brain.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call