Abstract

False alarm rates several orders of magnitude higher than the designed false alarm rate are frequently observed on active, low-frequency, towed array sonars. Increased false alarm rate originates from at least two effects: clutter and false alarm rate inflation (FARI). Clutter, or non-Rayleigh probability distributions of the matched-filter (MF) envelope, is often observed on high-resolution sonars, since too few scatterers are resolved for the central limit theorem to hold. FARI is a signal-processing-induced source of false alarms that occurs when the reverberation is nonstationary in the normalizer window. For example, the reverberation in the analyzed sample originates from a seamount, while most of the normalizer window falls to the side of the seamount, resulting in an underestimated background power estimate, and therefore, increased false alarm rate. By combining a fast and accurate acoustic model with a high-resolution terrain model, occurrence of FARI may be predicted. The described method outputs the modeled probability of false alarm, which is the probability that a false alarm is generated at a given location. The method is tested by comparing spatial concentrations of measured false alarms to modeled probability of false alarm. Comparison shows that a significant amount of false alarms is generated due to FARI, and that occurrence of FARI can be predicted given detailed environmental input.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call