Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the commonly used equations (Harris-Benedict (HB), Schofield (S) and equations based on midarm circumference (MAC) and midarm muscle circumference (MAMC) in predicting resting energy expenditure (REE) in a population of patients with musculoskeletal deformities. 20 kyphoscoliotic patients (15 female (F); 5 male (M); mean age 59.6 years) and 10 controls (7 F; 3M; 59.8 years) were studied. REE measured by indirect calorimetry (IC) with a ventilated canopy system (Deltatrac metabolic monitor) was not significantly different between patients and controls (Mean (SD) REE (MJ/24 h): Patients: 5.48 (1.1); controls: 5.28(0.8)). In patients with deformities the Schofield equation gave values which were closest to measured REE (mean difference and limits of agreement IC vs S: 0.098 MJ/24 h; −0.822 and 1.018). The Harris-Benedict equation using height (Ht) and armspan (AS) in lieu of height also gave acceptable results (IC vs HB (Ht): 0.34; −0.638 and 1.318; IC vs HB (AS): 0.255; −0.683 and 1.253). Equations based on MAC and MAMC compared poorly (IC vs MAC equation: 0.398; −1.530 and 2.326; IC vs MAMC equation 0.687; −0.911 and 2.285). On regression analysis the equation REE = 0.295 (MAMC) + 0.0483 (AS) −0.0324 (age) −6.25 predicted REE best in the patient population (r 2 = 0.861).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call