Abstract
Vedolizumab is known to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective. However, as personalization becomes an increasingly important aspect of IBD care and in lieu of guidelines to inform clinicians on positioning of biologics, there is a need to reliably predict response to inform patient preferences and shared decision-making. Recent data from clinical trials and real-world evidence have elucidated predictors of clinical and endoscopic response while providing the framework to establish predictive models. Current models are able to predict that those patients with less severe disease, without prior biologic exposure and who demonstrate early response to VDZ have the highest rates of durable clinical and endoscopic response and remission. When incorporating these models into clinical practice, clinicians will be able to identify those patients who are likely to respond before drug initiation as well as early non-responders and response latency after initiation of vedolizumab. In a shift toward personalization of medicine in IBD, the ability of predictive models for vedolizumab to aid pre-biologic and early management will inform both clinician and patient. Ideally this will provide both a personalized and more cost-effective approach, though further studies in cost-analysis in this framework are needed. Though current models are comprehensive of existing data, future research on microbial and translational biomarkers will be additive and necessary to provide full personalization of treatment.
Highlights
Joseph Meserve and Parambir Dulai*Department of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States Reviewed by: Raja Atreya, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany Santiago García López, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Spain Specialty section: This article was submitted to Gastroenterology, a section of the journal
Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a humanized monoclonal anti-integrin biologic approved for moderate to severe Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
With multiple options available for therapy in moderate to severe Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), many of which appear to be equivalent in effectiveness and safety, there has been a necessary push to improve shared-decision making around treatment choices
Summary
Department of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States Reviewed by: Raja Atreya, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany Santiago García López, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Spain Specialty section: This article was submitted to Gastroenterology, a section of the journal
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.