Abstract

Background: PAIS exhibits a complex spectrum of phenotypes and pubertal outcomes. The paucity of reliable prognostic indicators can confound management decisions including sex-of rearing. We assessed whether external masculinisation score (EMS) at birth or functional assays correlates with pubertal outcome in PAIS patients and whether the EMS is helpful in sex assignment. Methods: We collected pubertal outcome for 27 male-assigned PAIS patients, all with confirmed androgen receptor (AR) mutations, including two previously uncharacterized variants (I899F; Y916C). Patients were grouped as follows; EMS at birth <5 and ≥5 (EMS in normal males is 12; median EMS in PAIS is 4.7) and pubertal outcomes compared. Findings: Only 6/9 patients (67%) with EMS <5 underwent spontaneous onset of puberty, versus all 18 patients with EMS ≥5 (p=0.03). Only 1/6 patients (17%) with EMS <5 developed adult genitalia reaching Tanner stage 4 or 5, versus 11/13 (85%) with EMS ≥5 (p=0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups of patients in being prescribed androgen replacement, who reached adult testicular volume ≥15ml, pubic hair Tanner stage 4 or 5, above average adult height, had gynaecomastia, mastectomy, or evidence of spermatogenesis. No correlation was observed between EMS and in vitro AR function. Interpretation: In PAIS with AR mutation, birth EMS is a simple predictor of spontaneous pubertal onset and satisfactory adult genitalia. This provides a pragmatic contribution to decision making for PAIS sex assignment. Funding: NL was funded by Singapore National Medical Research Council (NMRC) Transition Award (NMRC/TA/0037/2015). RTC was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. JW and VM were supported by the University of Nottingham BBSRC Doctoral Training program (BB/M008770/1). BM was supported by a University of Nottingham Vice Chancellors scholarship. Declaration of Interest: We declare no competing interests. Ethical Approval: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the local research ethics committee (09/H0308/158), and institutional approval was obtained from the Research and Development Committee at the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.