Abstract

Change orders in construction projects are very common and result in negative impacts on various project facets. The impact of change orders on labor productivity is particularly difficult to quantify. Traditional approaches are inadequate to calculate the complex input-output relationship necessary to measure the effect of change orders. This study develops the Evolutionary Fuzzy Support Vector Machines Inference Model (EFSIM) to more accurately predict change-order-related productivity losses. The EFSIM is an AI-based tool that combines fuzzy logic (FL), support vector machine (SVM), and fast messy genetic algorithm (fmGA). The SVM is utilized as a supervised learning technique to solve classification and regression problems; the FL is used to quantify vagueness and uncertainty; and the fmGA is applied to optimize model parameters. A case study is presented to demonstrate and validate EFSIM performance. Simulation results and our validation against previous studies demonstrate that the EFSIM predicts the impact of change orders significantly better than other AI-based tools including the artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and evolutionary support vector machine inference model (ESIM).

Highlights

  • Changes during construction projects are very common, making construction one of the most complex industries

  • The objective of this research is to use Evolutionary Fuzzy Support Vector Machines Inference Model (EFSIM) to predict productivity loss caused by change orders

  • Database records contain several attributes related to productivity loss caused by change orders

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Changes during construction projects are very common, making construction one of the most complex industries. While most change order items (e.g. material, scheduling, rework, equipment) can be relatively easy to measure, quantifying the impact on labor productivity is typically more complicated (Hanna et al 1999a). Many studies have reported on the impact of change orders on labor productivity. The methods used in the literature to calculate productivity loss can be grouped into the 3 categories of (1) regression analysis (Leonard 1988; Moselhi et al 1991; Ibbs 2005), (2) artificial neural network (ANN) (Moselhi et al 2005), and (3) statisticalfuzzy (Hanna et al 2002). Previous studies (Hanna et al 2002; Moselhi et al 2005) have reported that ANN and statistical-fuzzy methods outperform regression analysis. No method is suitable for calculating productivity loss because prediction accuracies are outside of acceptable limits

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call