Abstract
SEE EISSA AND SCHEVON DOI101093/AWW332 FOR A SCIENTIFIC COMMENTARY ON THIS ARTICLE: Surgery can be a last resort for patients with intractable, medically refractory epilepsy. For many of these patients, however, there is substantial risk that the surgery will be ineffective. The prediction of who is likely to benefit from a surgical approach is crucial for being able to inform patients better, conduct principled prospective clinical trials, and ultimately tailor therapeutic approaches to these patients more effectively. Dynamical computational models, informed with patient data, can be used to make predictions and give mechanistic insight. In this study, we develop patient-specific dynamical network models of epileptogenic cortex. We infer the network connectivity matrix from non-seizure electrographic recordings of patients and use these connectivity matrices as the network structure in our model. The model simulates the dynamics of a bi-stable switch at every node in this network, meaning that every node starts in a background state, but has the ability to transit to a co-existing seizure state. Whether a transition happens in a node is partly determined by the stochastic nature of the input to the node, but also by the input the node receives from other connected nodes in the network. By conducting simulations with such a model, we can detect the average transition time for nodes in a given network, and therefore define nodes with a short transition time as highly epileptogenic. In a retrospective study, we found that in some patients the regions with high epileptogenicity in the model overlap with those identified clinically as the seizure onset zone. Moreover, it was found that the resection of these regions in the model reduces the overall likelihood of a seizure. Following removal of these regions in the model, we predicted surgical outcomes and compared these to actual patient outcomes. Our predictions were found to be 81.3% accurate on a dataset of 16 patients with intractable epilepsy. Intriguingly, in patients with unsuccessful outcomes, the proposed computational approach is able to suggest alternative resection sites. The model presented here gives mechanistic insight as to why surgery may be unsuccessful in some patients. This may aid clinicians in presurgical evaluation by providing a tool to explore various surgical options, offering complementary information to existing clinical techniques.
Highlights
Focal epilepsy is a common neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures together with abnormal electrographic activity in localized brain areas
We simulated the epileptogenicity of different brain regions in a mathematical model using interictal networks derived from ECoG recordings
We observe that regions with high epileptogenicity arise in the dynamical model, which often correspond to the surgically resected regions in patients who achieved seizure freedom
Summary
Focal epilepsy is a common neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures together with abnormal electrographic activity in localized (focal) brain areas. 30% of patients suffering from focal seizures are refractory to medication, surgical intervention is considered as an alternative treatment. To determine the location of the seizure focus, presurgical evaluations are usually performed, using a combination of the history, physical exam, neuroimaging, EEG and other modalities (Rosenow and Luders, 2001; Duncan et al, 2016). In some patients these studies are insufficient and intracranial EEG is required with a focus on ictal activity as the prime marker of brain regions underlying the epilepsy. It will be beneficial to be able to predict in a patient-specific manner when surgery will not work and to suggest alternative resection sites
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.