Abstract

Inferring intentions of others is one of the most intriguing issues in interpersonal interaction. Theories of embodied cognition and simulation suggest that this mechanism takes place through a direct and automatic matching process that occurs between an observed action and past actions. This process occurs via the reactivation of past self-related sensorimotor experiences within the inferior frontoparietal network (including the mirror neuron system, MNS). The working model is that the anticipatory representations of others' behaviors require internal predictive models of actions formed from pre-established, shared representations between the observer and the actor. This model suggests that observers should be better at predicting intentions performed by a familiar actor, rather than a stranger. However, little is known about the modulations of the intention brain network as a function of the familiarity between the observer and the actor. Here, we combined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a behavioral intention inference task, in which participants were asked to predict intentions from three types of actors: A familiar actor (their significant other), themselves (another familiar actor), and a non-familiar actor (a stranger). Our results showed that the participants were better at inferring intentions performed by familiar actors than non-familiar actors and that this better performance was associated with greater activation within and beyond the inferior frontoparietal network i.e., in brain areas related to familiarity (e.g., precuneus). In addition, and in line with Hebbian principles of neural modulations, the more the participants reported being cognitively close to their partner, the less the brain areas associated with action self-other comparison (e.g., inferior parietal lobule), attention (e.g., superior parietal lobule), recollection (hippocampus), and pair bond (ventral tegmental area, VTA) were recruited, suggesting that the more a shared mental representation has been pre-established, the more neurons show suppression in their response to the presentation of information to which they are sensitive. These results suggest that the relation of performance to the extent of neural activation during intention understanding may display differential relationships based on the cognitive domain, brain region, and the cognitive interdependence between the observer and the actor.

Highlights

  • IntroductionReading mental states and inferring intentions of others plays a fundamental role in successful social interactions (Wolpert et al, 2003; Sebanz and Frith, 2004; Frith and Frith, 2006; Aglioti et al, 2008; Cacioppo et al, 2014; Rizzolatti et al, 2014; Friston and Frith, 2015; Isoda, 2016; Rizzolatti and Sinigaglia, 2016)

  • The (0.5 Self + 0.5 Partner) > Stranger contrast revealed a significant set of brain areas that include brain regions involved in intention understanding within and beyond the inferior fronto-parietal intention network, extending to the middle temporal gyrus (MTG)

  • The connection analyses using Inferior Parietal Lobule (IPL) as a seed revealed that IPL is connected to many cortical and subcortical areas, such as the ventral tegmental area (VTA)—a dopaminergic receptor-rich subcortical area that has been previously associated with pair-bond (Cacioppo et al, 2012a,b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reading mental states and inferring intentions of others plays a fundamental role in successful social interactions (Wolpert et al, 2003; Sebanz and Frith, 2004; Frith and Frith, 2006; Aglioti et al, 2008; Cacioppo et al, 2014; Rizzolatti et al, 2014; Friston and Frith, 2015; Isoda, 2016; Rizzolatti and Sinigaglia, 2016). Theories on embodied cognition and simulation suggest that this mechanism underlying intention understanding takes place through “a direct and automatic matching process between an observed action and previously performed actions, via the reactivation of past self-related sensorimotor experiences” (di Pellegrino et al, 1992; Rizzolatti and Sinigaglia, 2016) Within this matching process, the inferior frontoparietal network, including the mirror neuron system (MNS), plays a critical role by facilitating the observer’s understanding of actions and intentions performed by other people (Grafton, 2009; Maranesi et al, 2014; Rizzolatti and Sinigaglia, 2016). No facilitation effect was found in this condition, which reinforces prior findings that suggest that the automatic facilitation effect of familiar agents on intention understanding likely occurs at “an associative, rather than a perceptual level” (Ortigue et al, 2010b)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.