Abstract
There has been a surge of interest in examining the utility of methods for capturing individual differences in decision-making style. We illustrate the potential offered by Movement Pattern Analysis (MPA), an observational methodology that has been used in business and by the US Department of Defense to record body movements that provide predictive insight into individual differences in decision-making motivations and actions. Twelve military officers participated in an intensive 2-h interview that permitted detailed and fine-grained observation and coding of signature movements by trained practitioners using MPA. Three months later, these subjects completed four hypothetical decision-making tasks in which the amount of information sought out before coming to a decision, as well as the time spent on the tasks, were under the partial control of the subject. A composite MPA indicator of how a person allocates decision-making actions and motivations to balance both Assertion (exertion of tangible movement effort on the environment to make something occur) and Perspective (through movements that support shaping in the body to perceive and create a suitable viewpoint for action) was highly correlated with the total number of information draws and total response time—individuals high on Assertion reached for less information and had faster response times than those high on Perspective. Discussion focuses on the utility of using movement-based observational measures to capture individual differences in decision-making style and the implications for application in applied settings geared toward investigations of experienced leaders and world statesmen where individuality rules the day.
Highlights
The idea that individuals can and do differ in how they approach decision-making situations has a long history, recent reviews (Mohammed and Schwall, 2009; Appelt et al, 2011) have called for heightened attention to individual differences in decision-making style
Our purpose was to illustrate the potential of using observational methodologies in the service of detecting signature decision-making styles in seasoned leaders that can be used to provide insight into how individuals differ when presented with decisions to be made
The observational nature of the Movement Pattern Analysis (MPA) paradigm highlights that we do not have to rely entirely on self-report measures to characterize individuals with respect to their “underlying” decision-making style that may predict future decision-making behavior—which again resonates with reminders that observable behavior should be part of measurement strategies in personality science (Baumeister et al, 2007; Funder, 2009; Furr, 2009)
Summary
The idea that individuals can and do differ in how they approach decision-making situations has a long history, recent reviews (Mohammed and Schwall, 2009; Appelt et al, 2011) have called for heightened attention to individual differences in decision-making style. The key notion is that we need to deepen our understanding of lawful variations in the decision-making process across individuals (e.g., Byman and Pollack, 2001; Thunholm, 2004; Del Missier et al, 2010; Harman, 2011; Bruine de Bruin et al, 2012) Put another way, we need to embrace the idea that who is making the decision matters along with the situational and conditional factors that impact how the process of decision-making unfolds. It is evident that an individual differences framework can be a driving force in the decisionmaking sciences in the same way it has impacted and shaped research in other behavioral domains
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.