Abstract

Simple SummaryIn Australia, feeding grazing dairy cows concentrate and forage supplements is common. Dairy farmers face the challenge of profitably feeding their cows in situations where there is significant variation in feed costs and milk price. We used the results of grazing experiments to develop equations that predict the yield of milk fat and milk protein when different combinations of concentrates and pasture + forage are fed to grazing lactating dairy cows. We applied economic principles to these predictions to estimate the optimal combination of these feeds for given costs and prices. Feed is the largest variable cost in dairying. The allocation of pasture and supplements that are based on better estimates of milk responses to supplements should lead to increased profit for farmers.Feed is the largest variable cost for dairy farms in Australia, and dairy farmers are faced with the challenge of profitably feeding their cows in situations where there is significant variation in input costs and milk price. In theory, the addition of 5.2 MJ of metabolisable energy to a lactating cow’s diet should be capable of supporting an increase in milk production of one litre of milk of 4.0% fat, 3.2% protein and 4.9% lactose. However, this is almost never seen in practice, due to competition for energy from other processes (e.g., body tissue gain), forage substitution, associative effects and imbalances in rumen fermentation. Pasture species, stage of maturity, pasture mass, allowance and intake, stage of lactation, cow body condition and type of supplement can all affect the milk protein plus fat production response to additional feed consumed by grazing dairy cows. We developed a model to predict marginal milk protein plus fat response/kg DM intake when lactating dairy cows consume concentrates and pasture + forages. Data from peer reviewed published experiments undertaken in Australia were collated into a database. Meta-analysis techniques were applied to the data and a two-variable quadratic polynomial production function was developed. Production economic theory was used to estimate the level of output for given quantities of input, the marginal physical productivity of each input, the isoquants for any specified level of output and the optimal input combination for given costs and prices of inputs and output. The application of the model and economic overlay was demonstrated using four scenarios based on a farm in Gippsland, Victoria. Given that feed accounts for the largest input cost in dairying, allocation of pasture and supplements that are based on better estimates of marginal milk responses to supplements should deliver increased profit from either savings in feed costs, or in some cases, increased output to approach the point where marginal revenue equals marginal costs. Such data are critical if the industry is to take advantage of the opportunities to use supplements to improve both productivity and profitability.

Highlights

  • Feed is the largest variable cost for dairy farms in Australia, and dairy farmers are faced with the challenge of profitably feeding their cows in situations where there is significant variation in input costs and milk price [1]

  • The models reported by Heard et al [2] were developed using meta-analysis techniques, and were subsequently employed by Ho et al [1] to demonstrate the value of applying marginal economic theory to make on-farm, profitable and tactical concentrate feeding decisions

  • Many strategies are employed; some farmers feed supplements according to current milk production and changes they expect, some according to stage of lactation, some use a strategy of flat-rate feeding and some aim to manage their pastures to a consistent grazing height and use indicators such as overgrazing or wastage to judge the appropriate rate of supplement to feed [1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Feed is the largest variable cost for dairy farms in Australia, and dairy farmers are faced with the challenge of profitably feeding their cows in situations where there is significant variation in input costs and milk price [1]. Heard et al [2] reported new empirical models that predicted the quantitative relationship between milk yield (and milk protein and milk fat yield) and dry matter intake of cereal-based supplements by grazing dairy cows in Australia. Such models are known as production functions. As the meta-analysis had only included results from experiments in which grazing cows were fed cereal-based supplements, these models were of limited use because they could not be applied in situations where the cows’ diet included supplementary hay and silage. While it is difficult to know exactly what proportion of dairy farmers feed their lactating herd both supplementary concentrates and forages as part of the milking ration, on average, hay and silage made up 34% of the total tonnes of DM consumed on the milking area of the farms contributing to the 2019/2020

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call