Abstract
Previous research differentiated expert vs. novice performances based on how (dis)similar novices’ action sequences were from that of the expert’s by way of similarity measures. Action sequences were coded using an ‘objective-oriented’ (or task-based) approach based on the sequence of objectives/tasks completed in-game. Findings from these studies suggest that the task-based similarity measures is a better predictor than (a) distance traversed, and (b) time (of completion).In this study, we suggested an alternative method to code action sequences of experts and novices by way of a ‘navigational’ (or tile-based) approach. We divided a game-map into grids/tiles of different sizes to facilitate tracing of the path traversed by players in game and proceeded to test the effect of grid sizes on differentiating between experts and novices. We further compared the two different action sequence coding approaches and their abilities to measure players’ competency improvement in serious games. The results of the study showed that the size of game grids does matter, and that both task-based and tile-based action sequence coding approaches are useful for serious games analytics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.