Abstract
AbstractFew studies have investigated how search behavior affects complex writing tasks. We analyze a dataset of 150 long essays whose authors searched the ClueWeb09 corpus for source material, while all querying, clicking, and writing activity was meticulously recorded. We model the effect of search and writing behavior on essay quality using path analysis. Since the boil‐down and build‐up writing strategies identified in previous research have been found to affect search behavior, we model each writing strategy separately. Our analysis shows that the search process contributes significantly to essay quality through both direct and mediated effects, while the author's writing strategy moderates this relationship. Our models explain 25–35% of the variation in essay quality through rather simple search and writing process characteristics alone, a fact that has implications on how search engines could personalize result pages for writing tasks. Authors' writing strategies and associated searching patterns differ, producing differences in essay quality. In a nutshell: essay quality improves if search and writing strategies harmonize—build‐up writers benefit from focused, in‐depth querying, while boil‐down writers fare better with a broader and shallower querying strategy.
Highlights
Users of information systems seek support in various daily activities, and while search processes, that is, querying and assessment of search results, likely affect the outcome of the tasks behind the search, only few studies have explored these associations
Our study is one of the first attempts at modeling task outcome by search process variables taking into account the use of information found for the task
Its results significantly extend our understanding of how search process and writing effort contribute to the quality of essay text and how writing strategies moderate the contribution of these variables
Summary
Users of information systems seek support in various daily activities, and while search processes, that is, querying and assessment of search results, likely affect the outcome of the tasks behind the search, only few studies have explored these associations. Performance is assessed by the output of the search, rather than by its outcome, that is, the resulting benefits to the task at hand (Belkin, 2010; Järvelin et al, 2015; Vakkari, 2003). Since the utility of search results depends on how much they contributes to the outcome of an underlying task, the use of information retrieved is a link between search process and task outcome (Järvelin et al, 2015; Vakkari, Völske, Potthast, Hagen, & Stein, 2019). We analyze to what extent search process—i.e., querying, result examination, and information selection in documents—and text
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.