Abstract

Background: The greatest degree of language recovery in post-stroke aphasia takes place within the first weeks. Aphasia severity and lesion measures have been shown to be good predictors of long-term outcomes. However, little is known about their implications in early spontaneous recovery. The present study sought to determine which factors better predict early language outcomes in individuals with post-stroke aphasia.Methods: Twenty individuals with post-stroke aphasia were assessed <72 h (acute) and 10–14 days (subacute) after stroke onset. We developed a composite score (CS) consisting of several linguistic sub-tests: repetition, oral comprehension and naming. Lesion volume, lesion load and diffusion measures [fractional anisotropy (FA) and axial diffusivity (AD)] from both arcuate fasciculi (AF) were also extracted using MRI scans performed at the same time points. A series of regression analyses were performed to predict the CS at the second assessment.Results: Among the diffusion measures, only FA from right AF was found to be a significant predictor of early subacute aphasia outcome. However, when combined in two hierarchical models with FA, age and either lesion load or lesion size, the initial aphasia severity was found to account for most of the variance (R2 = 0.678), similarly to the complete models (R2 = 0.703 and R2 = 0.73, respectively).Conclusions: Initial aphasia severity was the best predictor of early post-stroke aphasia outcome, whereas lesion measures, though highly correlated, show less influence on the prediction model. We suggest that factors predicting early recovery may differ from those involved in long-term recovery.

Highlights

  • The greatest degree of language recovery in post-stroke aphasia takes place within the first weeks

  • The variables that were found to be significant were included in a hierarchical multivariate regression later. Two models of this hierarchical regression were tested. Both of them were computed in three blocks: in the first block, age, and initial aphasia severity were entered as control variables, or covariates (since previous research has already shown a certain capacitSyntax Error (67061): Bad LZW stream - unexpected code y of prediction of both of them for later outcomes in aphasia) [6]; in the second block, we introduced either lesion size or lesion load of the left AF; in the third block, we introduced the significant diffusion variables from the first regression that we performed

  • As for the predictions of the composite score during the early sub-acute phase, the most successful model consisted of a combination of age, lesion size, initial aphasia severity, and fractional anisotropy (FA) of the long segment of the right AF

Read more

Summary

Methods

Twenty individuals with post-stroke aphasia were assessed

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call