Abstract

The true density of an amorphous solid is an important parameter for studying and modeling materials behavior. Experimental measurements of density using helium pycnometry are standard but may be prevented if the material is prone to rapid recrystallization, or preparation of gram quantities of reproducible pure component amorphous materials proves impossible. The density of an amorphous solid can be approximated by assuming it to be 95% of its respective crystallographic density; however, this can be inaccurate or impossible if the crystal structure is unknown. Molecular dynamic simulations were used to predict the density of 20 amorphous solid materials. The calculated density values for 10 amorphous solids were compared with densities that were experimentally determined using helium pycnometry. In these cases, the amorphous densities calculated using molecular dynamics had an average percent error of - 0.7% relative to the measured values, with a maximum error of - 3.48%. In contrast, comparisons of amorphous density approximated from crystallographic structures with pycnometrically measured values resulted in an average percent error of + 3.7%, with a maximum error of + 9.42%. These data suggest that the density of an amorphous solid can be accurately predicted using molecular dynamic simulations and allowed reliable calculation of density for the remaining 10 materials for which pycnometry could not be done.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call