Abstract

Background: Ineffective communication using inappropriate channels and poor listening skills have resulted in poor compliance with information security (InfoSec) policies. Lack of compliance with InfoSec policies minimises employee proficiency whilst also exposing organisations to business risk. Objectives: This research addresses management’s concern regarding why employees do not comply with InfoSec policies and proposes that how policies are communicated is integral to compliance and that effective communication can serve to ameliorate compliance. Method: The research adopts communication theories from knowledge management, psychology and information systems to draw on important constructs which are then tested in order to identify those that can strongly predict InfoSec policy compliance. The research was quantitative and used a survey to elicit responses from a sample of 100 employees selected from 6 organisations. Results: Our findings suggest that of the 10 communication constructs used in the miscellany of perception and determinism (MPD) framework, half of these (five) constructs strongly predicated compliance, namely reasons for communication, media appropriateness, non-conflicting interpretations, feedback immediacy and personal focus . The rest of the constructs were weak predictors or could not predict compliance. Conclusion: The research advances InfoSec literature by adapting the MPD model as integral to the development, communication and importantly, compliance with InfoSec policies. The MPD model is pertinent as it aggregates theories of communication from a number of academic disciplines and underpinnings not considered before, thereby improving our understanding on how we communicate InfoSec policies for better compliance.

Highlights

  • Information security (InfoSec) policy formulation and compliance lies at the heart of addressing how personally identifiable information (PII) is treated by organisations (Siponen, Mahmood & Pahnila 2009)

  • The miscellany of perception and determinism (MPD) model is pertinent as it aggregates theories of communication from a number of academic disciplines and underpinnings not considered before, thereby improving our understanding on how we communicate InfoSec policies

  • Following through a literature review and focusing on how policies are communicated to users whom literature has identified as threats, this research was undertaken to present a communication model that could predict InfoSec policy compliance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Information security (InfoSec) policy formulation and compliance lies at the heart of addressing how personally identifiable information (PII) is treated by organisations (Siponen, Mahmood & Pahnila 2009). On 25 May 2018, an important zeitgeist arose that dictated new ways that organisations should adopt to treat personal information (Tikkinen-Piri, Rohunen & Markkula 2018) From this period onwards, the handling and protection of personal information became a concern for the executive board of companies through enactment of privacy laws that protect personal information, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (Tikkinen-Piri et al 2018). The handling and protection of personal information became a concern for the executive board of companies through enactment of privacy laws that protect personal information, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (Tikkinen-Piri et al 2018) This prerogative has been daunting considering that advanced knowledge-sharing technologies have resulted to user’s e-visibility embodied by online presence on the World Wide Web, making discoverability via e-profiles relatively easy (Adriaanse & Rensleigh 2017b). Lack of compliance with InfoSec policies minimises employee proficiency whilst exposing organisations to business risk

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call