Abstract

The application of machine learning for the development of clinical decision-support systems in audiology provides the potential to improve the objectivity and precision of clinical experts' diagnostic decisions. However, for successful clinical application, such a tool needs to be accurate, as well as accepted and trusted by physicians. In the field of audiology, large amounts of patients' data are being measured, but these are distributed over local clinical databases and are heterogeneous with respect to the applied assessment tools. For the purpose of integrating across different databases, the Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) were recently established as abstract representations of the contained audiological information describing relevant functional aspects of the human auditory system. As an intermediate layer in a clinical decision-support system for audiology, the CAFPAs aim at maintaining interpretability to the potential users. Thus far, the CAFPAs were derived by experts from audiological measures. For designing a clinical decision-support system, in a next step the CAFPAs need to be automatically derived from available data of individual patients. Therefore, the present study aims at predicting the expert generated CAFPA labels using three different machine learning models, namely the lasso regression, elastic nets, and random forests. Furthermore, the importance of different audiological measures for the prediction of specific CAFPAs is examined and interpreted. The trained models are then used to predict CAFPAs for unlabeled data not seen by experts. Prediction of unlabeled cases is evaluated by means of model-based clustering methods. Results indicate an adequate prediction of the ten distinct CAFPAs. All models perform comparably and turn out to be suitable choices for the prediction of CAFPAs. They also generalize well to unlabeled data. Additionally, the extracted relevant features are plausible for the respective CAFPAs, facilitating interpretability of the predictions. Based on the trained models, a prototype of a clinical decision-support system in audiology can be implemented and extended towards clinical databases in the future.

Highlights

  • Clinical decision-making is a complex and multi-dimensional process which comprises gathering, interpreting, and evaluating data in the context of a clinical case, in order to derive an evidence-based action [1]

  • The results for the remaining Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) for the given imputed data set are provided in the Supplementary Figures 1, 2

  • The present study proved the feasibility of automatically predicting Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) from audiological measures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clinical decision-making is a complex and multi-dimensional process which comprises gathering, interpreting, and evaluating data in the context of a clinical case, in order to derive an evidence-based action [1]. Due to the complexity of the process, clinical decision-making is obviously prone to errors. Their rates in general practice have been estimated as high as 15% [2]. Wrong clinical decisions can have considerable negative impact on the quality of life of the affected individuals [3]. This is true for decision-making in audiology. Considering that [1] about 5% of the world population and one third of individuals aged above 65 years suffer from disabling hearing loss [4], [2] that the age group above 65 years is the fastest growing population [5], and [3] that decisions are prone to error in audiology, it is important to continuously improve the precision of clinical decision-making in this domain

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.