Abstract

The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is commonly used to assess cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease patients and is included in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. We divided 741 ADNI participants with blood microarray data into three groups based on their most recent CDR assessment: cognitive normal (CDR = 0), mild cognitive impairment (CDR = 0.5), and probable Alzheimer’s disease (CDR ≥ 1.0). We then used machine learning to predict cognitive status using only blood RNA levels. Only one probe for chloride intracellular channel 1 (CLIC1) was significant after correction. However, by combining individually nonsignificant probes with p-values less than 0.1, we averaged 87.87% (s = 1.02) predictive accuracy for classifying the three groups, compared to a 55.46% baseline for this study due to unequal group sizes. The best model had an overall precision of 0.902, recall of 0.895, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area of 0.904. Although we identified one significant probe in CLIC1, CLIC1 levels alone were not sufficient to predict dementia status and cannot be used alone in a clinical setting. Additional analyses combining individually suggestive, but nonsignificant, blood RNA levels were significantly predictive and may improve diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, we propose that patient features that do not individually predict cognitive status might still contribute to overall cognitive decline through interactions that can be elucidated through machine learning.

Highlights

  • Late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has long devastated the elderly population, affecting over10% of adults older than 65 [1]

  • The primary goal of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) has been to test whether serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), other biological markers, and clinical and neuropsychological assessment can be combined to measure the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early Alzheimer’s disease (AD)

  • Our analyses show that significantly higher levels of chloride intracellular channel 1 (CLIC1) exist in AD patients compared with cognitive normal and mild cognitive impairment groups and the effect size of the difference in moderate to high

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has long devastated the elderly population, affecting over10% of adults older than 65 [1]. Late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has long devastated the elderly population, affecting over. While AD was once considered a discrete disease with a single phenotype, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association classifies AD as a continuum of biomarker and neuroimaging levels under a biological construct [2], indicating that biology and cognitive decline are intertwined. Many techniques are available to diagnose cognitive decline, undetected dementia remains at 55–68% globally [3]. Patients are often unaware of their cognitive decline [4], limiting their ability to adequately address physical and mental limitations caused by dementia. 15–35% of patients older than 65 who are offered cognitive screening refuse to perform cognitive assessments, especially if they do not personally know anyone affected with AD [5,6]. Even after being referred by a community pharmacist to a physician for a follow-up cognitive study, almost 80% of pre-screened patients did not see a physician within 60 days, and over

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call