Abstract

Genetic and chemical perturbations impact diverse cellular phenotypes, including multiple indicators of cell health. These readouts reveal toxicity and antitumorigenic effects relevant to drug discovery and personalized medicine. We developed two customized microscopy assays, one using four targeted reagents and the other three targeted reagents, to collectively measure 70 specific cell health phenotypes including proliferation, apoptosis, reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, and cell cycle stage. We then tested an approach to predict multiple cell health phenotypes using Cell Painting, an inexpensive and scalable image-based morphology assay. In matched CRISPR perturbations of three cancer cell lines, we collected both Cell Painting and cell health data. We found that simple machine learning algorithms can predict many cell health readouts directly from Cell Painting images, at less than half the cost. We hypothesized that these models can be applied to accurately predict cell health assay outcomes for any future or existing Cell Painting dataset. For Cell Painting images from a set of 1500+ compound perturbations across multiple doses, we validated predictions by orthogonal assay readouts. We provide a web app to browse predictions: http://broad.io/cell-health-app. Our approach can be used to add cell health annotations to Cell Painting datasets.

Highlights

  • Perturbing cells with specific genetic and chemical reagents in different environmental contexts impacts cells in various ways (Kitano, 2002)

  • We collected Cell Painting images and targeted Cell Health readouts in three different cell lines (A549, ES2, and HCC44), each treated with 119 clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) perturbations targeting 59 genes and controls (Supplemental Table S1)

  • We developed and applied a bioinformatics pipeline to process features extracted from Cell Painting images by CellProfiler software (Carpenter et al, 2006)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Perturbing cells with specific genetic and chemical reagents in different environmental contexts impacts cells in various ways (Kitano, 2002). Cell health is normally assessed by eye or measured by targeted reagents, which are either focused on a single cell health parameter (e.g. ATP assays) or multiple in combination via FACS-based or image-based analyses, which involves a manual gating approach, complicated staining procedures, and significant reagent cost. These traditional approaches limit the ability to scale to large perturbation libraries such as candidate compounds in academic and pharmaceutical screening centers. One unbiased assay, called Cell Painting, stains for various cellular compartments and organelles using nonspecific and inexpensive reagents (Gustafsdottir et al, 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call