Abstract

Problem: Chronological aging in later life is associated with brain degeneration processes and increased risk for disease such as stroke and dementia. With a worldwide tendency of aging populations and increased longevity, mental health, and psychiatric research have paid increasing attention to understanding brain-related changes of aging. Recent findings suggest there is a brain age gap (a difference between chronological age and brain age predicted by brain imaging indices); the magnitude of the gap may indicate early onset of brain aging processes and disease. Artificial intelligence has allowed for a narrowing of the gap in chronological and predicted brain age. However, the factors that drive model predictions of brain age are still unknown, and there is not much about these factors that can be gleaned from the black-box nature of machine learning models. The goal of the present study was to test a brain age regression approach that is more amenable to interpretation by researchers and clinicians.Methods: Using convolutional neural networks we trained multiple regressor models to predict brain age based on single slices of magnetic resonance imaging, which included gray matter- or white matter-segmented inputs. We evaluated the trained models in all brain image slices to generate a final prediction of brain age. Unlike whole-brain approaches to classification, the slice-level predictions allows for the identification of which brain slices and associated regions have the largest difference between chronological and neuroimaging-derived brain age. We also evaluated how model predictions were influenced by slice index and plane, participant age and sex, and MRI data collection site.Results: The results show, first, that the specific slice used for prediction affects prediction error (i.e., difference between chronological age and neuroimaging-derived brain age); second, the MRI site-stratified separation of training and test sets removed site effects and also minimized sex effects; third, the choice of MRI slice plane influences the overall error of the model.Conclusion: Compared to whole brain-based predictive models of neuroimaging-derived brain age, slice-based approach improves the interpretability and therefore the reliability of the prediction of brain age using MRI data.

Highlights

  • Brain age prediction involves estimating chronological age based on information typically gleaned from neuroimaging data

  • Brain age can be computed from other approaches, such as the epigenetic clock from brain tissue [1], in this paper we use brain age as a synonym for neuroimaging-derived brain age

  • The difference between the predicted age and the actual chronological age is called brain age gap, which has been associated with a number of lifestyle factors [2] [e.g., tobacco and alcohol consumption [3], obesity [4], diabetes, schooling, physical activity [5], higher mortality risk [6], lower fluid intelligence, psychiatric disorders [7], and neurological diseases [8]]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain age prediction involves estimating chronological age based on information typically gleaned from neuroimaging data. The difference between the predicted age and the actual chronological age is called brain age gap, which has been associated with a number of lifestyle factors [2] [e.g., tobacco and alcohol consumption [3], obesity [4], diabetes, schooling, physical activity [5], higher mortality risk [6], lower fluid intelligence, psychiatric disorders [7], and neurological diseases [8]]. Brain age prediction methods still receive criticism due to the lack of interpretability [10]. The criticism stems from the limited information about what the model uses to predict brain age, and which regions might bias findings. To fulfill the promise of translational research, AI needs to establish reliable and reproducible prediction methods, and to generate models that are more amenable to clinical interpretation [10]. Identification of clinical neural markers and association with clinical and behavioral data may render AI applications more meaningful [10, 13, 14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call