Abstract

Bioaerosols are released in elevated quantities from composting facilities and are associated with negative health effects, although dose-response relationships are unclear. Exposure levels are difficult to quantify as established sampling methods are costly, time-consuming and current data provide limited temporal and spatial information. Confidence in dispersion model outputs in this context would be advantageous to provide a more detailed exposure assessment. We present the calibration and validation of a recognised atmospheric dispersion model (ADMS) for bioaerosol exposure assessments. The model was calibrated by a trial and error optimisation of observed Aspergillus fumigatus concentrations at different locations around a composting site. Validation was performed using a second dataset of measured concentrations for a different site. The best fit between modelled and measured data was achieved when emissions were represented as a single area source, with a temperature of 29°C. Predicted bioaerosol concentrations were within an order of magnitude of measured values (1000-10,000CFU/m3) at the validation site, once minor adjustments were made to reflect local differences between the sites (r2>0.7 at 150, 300, 500 and 600m downwind of source). Results suggest that calibrated dispersion modelling can be applied to make reasonable predictions of bioaerosol exposures at multiple sites and may be used to inform site regulation and operational management.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System (ADMS) is a Gaussian-based dispersion model developed by Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants (CERC) in which the atmospheric boundary layer is characterised by the Monin-Obukhov length and boundary layer depth (CERC, 2015a)

  • Validation of the model for bioaerosol emissions from composting was performed using the optimal model input values obtained via calibration

  • 36 adjustments were made to the initial model inputs, summarised in Fig. 1 to obtain a best fit between predicted and monitored bioaerosol concentration data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

P. Douglas et al / International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 220 (2017) 17–28 dose-response relationships of bioaerosols from composting are not well understood and data are limited (Pearson et al, 2015). Douglas et al / International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 220 (2017) 17–28 dose-response relationships of bioaerosols from composting are not well understood and data are limited (Pearson et al, 2015) To some extent this is a result of current measurement techniques which rely on capturing and culturing bioaerosols. This is time consuming and expensive, and only provides a snapshot of exposure spatially and temporally (Douglas 2013; Williams et al, 2013).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call