Abstract

BACKGROUND A maximal exercise test is often not available for patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and many programs determine a target heart rate (THR) using equations to estimate maximum heart rate (HRmax). The purpose of this study was to describe the % of patients in which a THR based on an estimated HRmax would result in a heart rate (HR) that is consistent with guidelines (i.e., 50%–80% HR reserve) in patients with heart disease (HD) on beta-blockade therapy. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of the iATTEND study; a randomized trial of facility-based only CR vs. hybrid CR. Subjects included in the present analysis had a history of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization procedure, or heart failure; beta-blockade therapy; and sinus rhythm. Exclusion criteria were heart transplant, atrial fibrillation, implanted pacemaker, and exercise-induced ischemia. Measured HR reserve (maximum - rest) was determined from a symptom-limited maximal exercise test with gas exchange performed on a treadmill. Estimated HRmax was determined using (a) 220 age and (b) a published equation based on patients with HD with beta-blockade (HD BB; 164-0.72xage). % measured HR reserve associated with 60% and 85% estimated HRmax using each equation was compared to guideline recommended intensity of 50%–80% measured HR reserve. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare measured HRmax to the 2 estimates of HRmax. RESULTS Among 166 subjects (68% male; age= 59±11 yr [mean±SD]) measured HRmax was 133±21 min 1. Compared to measured, estimated HRmax using 220-age was significantly higher (161±11 min- 1; p<.001) and estimated HRmax using HD-BB was significantly lower (121±8 min-1; p<.001). At 60% of 220-age, 19% of subjects would have been provided a THR that was consistent with guidelines; 72% would have been too low. At 60% of HD-BB, 1% of subjects would have been provided a THR that was consistent with guidelines; 99% would have been too low. At 85% of 220-age, 16% of subjects would have been provided a THR that was consistent with guidelines; 84% would have been too high. At 85% of HD-BB, 36% of subjects would have been provided a THR that was consistent with guidelines; 15% would have been too high. CONCLUSION THR based on % estimated HRmax from 220-age and HD-BB do not provide an exercise training HR target that is consistent with guideline recommendations, thus should not be used to prescribe an exercise intensity in patients with HD on BB therapy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call