Abstract
This Chapter presents an analysis of simple Hebrew identity sentences which I offer as a case study in the syntax of predication. Briefly, the facts are that Modern Hebrew (henceforth just ‘Hebrew’) allows assertions to be made with matrix small clauses; consisting of just a subject and a non-verbal predicate. It also allows ‘inflected small clauses’, where a pronominal copula, either personal (PronH) or impersonal (PronZ), realises Infl, and takes a non-verbal maximal projection as a complement. As far as the personal pronominal copula is concerned, it looks as if it is optional, since both inflected and non-inflected forms of the small clauses occur. However, in identity sentences, only the inflected form is possible. The point of this Chapter is to argue that the absence of uninflected identity small clauses follows from the requirement that every clause is an instance of a syntactic predication structure. I shall argue that where the post-copula XP is inherently a predicate, a predicate structure is formed whether or not Inflection is present, but that when the post-copula element is an argument and referential, Inflection is necessary to create a syntactic predication structure; furthermore, Infl is necessary to trigger the type shift which allows the identity sentence to be interpreted as a semantic predication structure.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.