Abstract

Interference competition occurs when access to an available resource is negatively affected by interactions with other individuals, where mutual interference involves individuals of the same species. The interactive phenomena among individuals may be size‐dependent, since body size is a major factor that may alter prey consumption rates and ultimately the dynamics and structure of food webs.A study was initiated in order to evaluate the effect of mutual interference in the prey‐specific attack rates and handling times of same size class predators, incorporating variation in consumer size. For this purpose, laboratory functional response experiments were conducted using same age predators, that is, newly hatched (first instar) or mature (fifth instar) nymphs of the polyphagous mirid predator Macrolophus pygmaeus preying on Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs.The experiments involved four predator density treatments, that is, one, two, three, or four predators of same age, that is, either first‐ or fifth‐instar nymphs, which were exposed to several prey densities. The Crowley–Martin model, which allows for interference competition between foraging predators, was used to fit the data.The results showed that mutual interference between predator's nymphs may occur that affect their foraging efficiency. The values of the attack rate coefficient were dependent on the predator density and for the first‐instar nymphs were significantly lower at the highest predator density than the lower predator densities, whereas for the fifth‐instar nymphs in all density treatments were significantly lower to that of the individual foragers' ones.These results indicate that mutual interference is more intense for larger predators and is more obvious at low prey densities where the competition level is higher. The wider use of predator‐dependent functional response models will help toward a mechanistic understanding of intraspecific interactions and its consequences on the stability and structure of food webs.

Highlights

  • Competition for resources is common in food webs (Kratina et al, 2009; Zhang et al, 2015), driving species distribution and evolution (Abrams, 2000; Craine & Dybzinski, 2013)

  • The values of the attack rate coefficient were dependent on the predator density and for the first-instar nymphs were significantly lower at the highest predator density than the lower predator densities, whereas for the fifth-instar nymphs in all density treatments were significantly lower to that of the individual foragers' ones

  • These results indicate that mutual interference is more intense for larger predators and is more obvious at low prey densities where the competition level is higher

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Competition for resources is common in food webs (Kratina et al, 2009; Zhang et al, 2015), driving species distribution and evolution (Abrams, 2000; Craine & Dybzinski, 2013). Extending Holling's assumptions, more realistic functional response modeling approaches have been developed to predict predation rates when the predator and the prey density vary. Michaelides et al (2018) showed that interactive effects on consumption of eggs of T. absoluta of two 5th-instar nymphs of M. pygmaeus were more intense at high prey densities. We searched whether mutual interference interacts with predator body size For this purpose, laboratory functional response experiments were conducted to test the effect of various predator–prey density combinations on feeding rate of similar sized individuals of either the 1st- or the 5th-instar nymphs of M. pygmaeus. The effect of predator density, prey density, and predator body size on conspecific interference was explored by utilizing specialized functional response models to estimate parameters that show the trends of interference and its intensity among the variable traits tested

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call