Abstract
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) populations in North America rebounded in the latter part of the twentieth century, the result of tightened protection and outlawing of pesticides such as DDT. An unintended consequence of recovery may be a negative impact on seabirds. During the 1980s, few bald eagles disturbed a large glaucous‐winged gull (Larus glaucescens) colony on Protection Island, Washington, USA, in the Salish Sea. Breeding gull numbers in this colony rose nearly 50% during the 1980s and early 1990s. Beginning in the 1990s, a dramatic increase in bald eagle activity ensued within the colony, after which began a significant decline in gull numbers.To examine whether trends in the gull colony could be explained by eagle activity, we fit a Lotka–Volterra‐type predator–prey model to gull nest count data and Washington State eagle territory data collected in most years between 1980 and 2016. Both species were assumed to grow logistically in the absence of the other.The model fits the data with generalized R 2 = 0.82, supporting the hypothesis that gull dynamics were due largely to eagle population dynamics.Point estimates of the model parameters indicated approach to stable coexistence. Within the 95% confidence intervals for the parameters, however, 11.0% of bootstrapped parameter vectors predicted gull colony extinction.Our results suggest that the effects of bald eagle activity on the dynamics of a large gull colony were explained by a predator–prey relationship that included the possibility of coexistence but also the possibility of gull colony extinction. This study serves as a cautionary exploration of the future, not only for gulls on Protection Island, but for other seabirds in the Salish Sea. Managers should monitor numbers of nests in seabird colonies as well as eagle activity within colonies to document trends that may lead to colony extinction.
Highlights
After years of decline, bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) populations throughout North America rebounded in the latter part of the twentieth century following tightened protection, reduction in the use of lead shot by hunters, and the outlawing of pesticides such as DDT (Hipfner et al, 2012; Watson, Stinson, McAllister, & Owens, 2002)
Our results suggest that the effects of bald eagle activity on the dynamics of a large gull colony were explained by a predator–prey relationship that included the possibility of coexistence and the possibility of gull colony extinction
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) populations throughout North America rebounded in the latter part of the twentieth century following tightened protection, reduction in the use of lead shot by hunters, and the outlawing of pesticides such as DDT (Hipfner et al, 2012; Watson, Stinson, McAllister, & Owens, 2002)
Summary
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) populations throughout North America rebounded in the latter part of the twentieth century following tightened protection, reduction in the use of lead shot by hunters, and the outlawing of pesticides such as DDT (Hipfner et al, 2012; Watson, Stinson, McAllister, & Owens, 2002). This recovery has provided one of the great success stories of the conservation movement (Millar & Lynch, 2006). Potential impacts of bald eagle populations on marine food‐web structure appear to be due to resident eagles, rather than overwintering eagles, and the rates at which they consume seabirds as prey (Harvey, Good, & Pearson, 2012)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.