Abstract
Conflict between ratio—dependent views of trophic interactions finds its simplest resolution in the comparison of steady—state responses of trophic chain to increases in primary productivity. We analyze data on trophic abundances of lake ecosystems with a general trophic—chain model that is intermediate between prey dependence and ratio dependence, and can describe either of the two extremes, depending on parameter values. We estimate, for all trophic levels, the set of interference coefficients that predicts the observed statistical relationship between biomasses of adjacent trophic levels. This constitutes a test of two competing theories, since the model we use is a prey—dependent model if all interference coefficients are °0, and a ratio—dependent model if they are °1. The results show that the observed relationships among trophic levels in lake ecosystems are compatible with a ratio—dependent parameterization of this model, with interference distributed relatively evenly across trophic chains, and are incompatible with a pure prey dependent parameterization. We suggest that approximate ratio dependence applied uniformly across trophic chains is a more plausible description of lake ecosystems than either pure prey dependence (non—interference) or "concentrated interference" (prey dependence at some trophic levels and partial interference in others).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.