Abstract

The expression of anti-predator adaptations may vary on a spatial scale, favouring traits that are advantageous in a given predation regime. Besides, evolution of different developmental strategies depends to a large extent on the grain of the environment and may result in locally canalized adaptations or, alternatively, the evolution of phenotypic plasticity as different predation regimes may vary across habitats. We investigated the potential for predator-driven variability in shell morphology in a freshwater snail, Radix balthica, and whether found differences were a specialized ecotype adaptation or a result of phenotypic plasticity. Shell shape was quantified in snails from geographically separated pond populations with and without molluscivorous fish. Subsequently, in a common garden experiment we investigated reaction norms of snails from populations' with/without fish when exposed to chemical cues from tench (Tinca tinca), a molluscivorous fish. We found that snails from fish-free ponds had a narrow shell with a well developed spire, whereas snails that coexisted with fish had more rotund shells with a low spire, a shell morphology known to increase survival rate from shell-crushing predators. The common garden experiment mirrored the results from the field survey and showed that snails had similar reaction norms in response to chemical predator cues, i.e. the expression of shell shape was independent of population origin. Finally, we found significant differences for the trait means among populations, within each pond category (fish/fish free), suggesting a genetic component in the determination of shell morphology that has evolved independently across ponds.

Highlights

  • Phenotypic plasticity is an important strategy among prey organisms against predation in freshwater habitats and there are many examples of plasticity in behavioural, chemical and morphological defence traits [1,2,3,4,5]

  • Radix balthica has for long been known for large interpopulation variation in shell morphology, ranging from individuals with a relatively small aperture, high spire and a slow expanding body whorl to individuals with a large aperture, low spire and a rapidly growing body whorl [25]

  • The species was previously divided into two species, Lymnaea peregra and L. ovata [13], later Wullschleger and Jokela [33] found that the shell form of L. peregra and L. ovata converged after two generations in the lab and argued that differences in shell shape was a result of phenotypic plasticity in response to habitat differences in permanence and water movement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phenotypic plasticity is an important strategy among prey organisms against predation in freshwater habitats and there are many examples of plasticity in behavioural, chemical and morphological defence traits [1,2,3,4,5]. A coarse grain environment is expected to select for canalisation and result in locally adapted ecotypes, while a fine grain environment with large environmental heterogeneity would favour the evolution of phenotypic plasticity or a single generalist [7,8]. Organisms that possess high dispersal rates would generally experience a fine-grained environment and evolve phenotypic plasticity to ensure adaptation to a fluctuating or variable environment [8,11,12]. Temporal variability in predation pressure, e.g. extinction/colonisation cycles of predatory fish, would create a fine-grained environment favouring the development of phenotypic plasticity in invertebrate prey organisms. A high dispersal rate among prey populations – between ponds with different predation regimes – may create a fine-grained environment and here selection should favour the evolution of phenotypic plasticity [8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.