Abstract

ABSTRACTThe freshwater crustacean Daphnia adapts to changing predation risks by forming inducible defences. These are only formed when they are advantageous, saving associated costs when the defence is superfluous. However, in order to be effective, the time lag between the onset of predation and the defence formation has to be short. Daphnia longicephala develop huge protective crests upon exposure to chemical cues (kairomones) from its predator the heteropteran backswimmer Notonecta glauca. To analyse time lags, we determined kairomone-sensitive stages and the developmental time frames of inducible defences. Moreover, we looked at additive effects that could result from the summation of prolonged kairomone exposure. Kairomones are perceived by chemoreceptors and integrated by the nervous system, which alters the developmental program leading to defence formation. The underlying neuronal and developmental pathways are not thoroughly described and surprisingly, the location of the kairomone receptors is undetermined. We show that D. longicephala start to sense predator cues at the onset of the second juvenile instar, defences develop with a time lag of one instar and prolonged kairomone exposure does not impact the magnitude of the defence. By establishing a method to reversibly impair chemosensors, we show the first antennae as the location of kairomone-detecting chemoreceptors. This study provides fundamental information on kairomone perception, kairomone-sensitive stages, developmental time frames and lag times of inducible defences in D. longicephala that will greatly contribute to the further understanding of the neuronal and developmental mechanisms of predator-induced defences in Daphnia.

Highlights

  • Phenotypic plasticity describes the ability of an organism with a given genotype to develop alternative phenotypes in response to changing environmental conditions (Bradshaw, 1965; Brown et al, 1970)

  • Costs are kept at a minimum, as many species scale their defences to the predation risk and the magnitude of defence formation is directly correlated with the concentration of predator kairomones (Tollrian, 1993)

  • Using a defined kairomone induction assay, we found that crest development in D. longicephala does not start before the 4th juvenile instar

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phenotypic plasticity describes the ability of an organism with a given genotype to develop alternative phenotypes in response to changing environmental conditions (Bradshaw, 1965; Brown et al, 1970) By adjusting their phenotype, organisms maximize their fitness in response to changing environmental factors (DeWitt and Scheiner, 2004), e.g. predation. These, so-called inducible defences can manifest as behavioural, morphological or shifts in life-history parameters and are elicited upon the perception of predator-specific chemical cues called ‘kairomones’. All of these inducible defensive strategies incur costs that are saved when the defence is not essential (Auld et al, 2010; Barry, 2002; DeWitt, 1998; Tollrian and Dodson, 1999; Walls et al, 1991). In order for inducible defence strategies to be advantageous, the costly time lags between kairomone perception and defence formation need to be minimal (Clark and Harvell, 1992; Jeschke et al, 2008; Hoverman and Relyea, 2007; Gabriel et al, 2005)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call