Abstract

Empirical evidence is beginning to show that predators can be important drivers of elemental cycling within ecosystems by propagating indirect effects that determine the distribution of elements among trophic levels as well as determine the chemical content of organic matter that becomes decomposed by microbes. These indirect effects can be propagated by predator consumptive effects on prey, nonconsumptive (risk) effects, or a combination of both. Currently, there is insufficient theory to predict how such predator effects should propagate throughout ecosystems. We present here a theoretical framework for exploring predator effects on ecosystem elemental cycling to encourage further empirical quantification. We use a classic ecosystem trophic compartment model as a basis for our analyses but infuse principles from ecological stoichiometry into the analyses of elemental cycling. Using a combined analytical-numerical approach, we compare how predators affect cycling through consumptive effects in which they control the flux of nutrients up trophic chains; through risk effects in which they change the homeostatic elemental balance of herbivore prey which accordingly changes the element ratio herbivores select from plants; and through a combination of both effects. Our analysis reveals that predators can have quantitatively important effects on elemental cycling, relative to a model formalism that excludes predator effects. Furthermore, the feedbacks due to predator nonconsumptive effects often have the quantitatively strongest impact on whole ecosystem elemental stocks, production and efficiency rates, and recycling fluxes by changing the stoichiometric balance of all trophic levels. Our modeling framework predictably shows how bottom-up control by microbes and top-down control by predators on ecosystems become interdependent when top predator effects permeate ecosystems.

Highlights

  • Trophic transfer and recycling of elements are integral parts of a fundamental ecosystem process that determines rates of primary and secondary production, food chain length, trophic biomass, and species diversity (DeAngelis 1992; Bardgett and Wardle 2010; Loreau 2010)

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • Our model explores the individual and combined effects of predator consumptive and nonconsumptive impacts on prey on ecosystem C and N cycling, relative to conditions where predators are absent

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Trophic transfer and recycling of elements are integral parts of a fundamental ecosystem process that determines rates of primary and secondary production, food chain length, trophic biomass, and species diversity (DeAngelis 1992; Bardgett and Wardle 2010; Loreau 2010). Consumers can mediate elemental transfer and recycling through resource consumption as well as through the release of elements as byproducts of their physiology (Kitchell et al 1979; DeAngelis 1992; Vanni 2002; Schmitz et al 2010; Dalton and Flecker 2014). Ecological stoichiometry has enhanced understanding of the mechanisms driving consumer-mediated elemental transfer and recy-.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.